Showing posts with label email rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label email rant. Show all posts

Friday, 1 April 2011

Learning to Love Email

I've beaten wikis to death in this space. I've presented arguments about how we can use them more effectively, why we need to shift how our organizations look at them, and even tried to explain how enterprise wikis change the traditional relationship between accountability and responsibility. In so doing, I think I may have overlooked a key factor:

Email.

That's right, email.

Now before you accuse me blasphemy, hear me out. I agree that many of us are literally swimming in email on a daily basis. If we weren't, there would be far less demand inside the organization for email-enabled smartphones, for placing hard caps on employees email storage capacities, or for the need to deploy email management techniques like Inbox Zero (which I admit I am currently using). Email is the one tool that has completely penetrated our workflows, and while on the whole I still think that using email to coordinate work is often inefficient, it has ultimately become the de facto modus operandi for most organizations.

Whether we like it or not, email is where the majority of us conduct our day to day operations, it's where our business happens, and it is where our decisions are made; and this, this simple fact, is why I think email is (might be?) the key to unlocking the true collaborative potential of our organizations. In short, email is where the people already are. We may have wasted some of our previous efforts trying to dislodge email's stranglehold on our workplace culture rather than strategically positioning other complementary tools around it.

Think about popular social networking sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, or Govloop.

They all have both internal email systems and also send an email to your external email address whenever you are touched within the system. This is their way of bringing you back into the platform itself. Now existing government wide systems like GCPEDIA, GCConnex and GCForums already ping us with emails but lack the user base to make using an internalized email system worthwhile. Compare this to the behemoth that is Facebook: someone may never even need to leave the walled garden if everyone they email is inside the garden with them. Think of it this way: there are currently 500 million active users on Facebook.

I'm not certain, but I think that in addition to being an enormous social network, Facebook is also the single largest global email directory on the planet. Where else can you find contact information quickly for 500 million people? Moreover, Facebook contextualizes your search by prioritizing your current friends, people who are in your "Kevin Bacon" network, your geographic network etc. Not to mention that you don't have to be connected to someone in order to send them a message. I don't think it is a stretch to posit that for some, Facebook has become (or is on their way to becoming) their primary email system.


The lesson from Facebook is clear

Tie your service in with people's existing email systems but also provide an internal alternative whose value scales with the number of people using the network and you may just erode the usefulness of existing email systems. I think the key piece of insight here is understanding that the majority of work occurs in your organization's email system, so if your approach to enterprise collaboration doesn't seamlessly integrate with (or completely replace) your enterprise's email client, your deployment will ultimately fail. Organizations need to build around email if they want it to cede its territory to alternate forms of communication. More specifically, they need to build around email and calendaring (which are usually part and parcel of the same system, this is why I expect Facebook to move towards more robust calendaring in the future).

To my mind, building enterprise collaboration around email (rather than in spite of it) is exactly why Google's Apps for Government is so popular in the United States and why many Microsoft shops are adopting SharePoint. Moreover, when systems built around current email-based workflows are properly supported with single sign-on and a federated search adoption undoubtedly becomes much easier. Ironically, this may also be the core challenge in the coming years of any multi-jurisdictional or Government of Canada-wide collaborative platforms.

Maybe its time we forget trying to supplant the email culture, embrace it, and move it forward. Let's learn to love email again.

[image credit: Tim Morgan]

This was originally published by Nick Charney at cpsrenewal.ca

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

Email Rant: 10 Second Commute

It's been awhile since we did an email rant. So without further ado.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: 10 second commute


hmmmm....

http://tinyurl.com/7l2bvx


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute

and yet we are looking for what, an additional 4 million square feet of commercial real estate?

Who's brand is #2 globally? Oh that's right IBM!


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


post both links on the blog... though with a more diplomatic spin


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute

btw did I mention that this podcast (c/o Deloitte) points to the fact that during hard economic times the government should be looking to reduce its capital expenditures and re-examine its real estate portfolio... (have I pushed you over the edge yet?)


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


you no doubt heard on the radio this morning that they're looking at about 4 big purchases... all at the same time and therefore artificially spiking up demand


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


yes. I actually like what the urban planner said yesterday morning on CBC about looking at commercial investments along the existing and planned transit way... that is, of course, if we had transit operators...

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


that best brand slide show isn't necessarily about best people to work for - though there is probably a distinct correlation.


-----Original Message-----
From:Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


i know but I am sure they also rank highly on employers... this is from 05 but I doubt much has changes since then, they probably still rank in the top 100.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: RE: 10 second commute

newer.


----Original Message-----
From: Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute


way to disprove the point and derail the rant - IBM Canada, not on that list... thanks a lot.

----Original Message-----
From: Mike
To: Nick
Subject: RE: 10 second commute

=)


----Original Message-----
From: Nick
To: Mike
Subject: RE: 10 second commute



Jacka...


Wednesday, 17 September 2008

Email Rant: Work Culture ... PS vs Google

-----Original Message-----
From: public_servant
To: ncharney


We just had a meeting about accommodation, they're taking out all our resource areas and meeting areas and just shoving in a bunch of new cubes. Ugh!

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: public_servant


Nice - who needs open and collaborative workspaces when we can enjoy Orwellian cubefarms?

I long for the day where government offices are local, decentralized and based on co-working:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coworking

btw - barcamp was hosted at a great location (the codefactory) which should be the model for future workspace in the PS.


-----Original Message-----
From: public_servant
To: ncharney


You mean like working for Google?

http://www.time.com/time/photoessays/2006/inside_google/

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: public_servant


Great link.

Wouldn't it be refreshing if the PS had something akin to the top 10 reasons to work @ Google?

Link: http://www.google.com/support/jobs/bin/static.py?page=about.html&about=top10

-----Original Message-----
From: public_servant
To: ncharney


Seriously why am I NOT working at Google?

It's surprising that they they don't include public servants in their list of "interesting people who work at Google.

Come on! Who wouldn't want to sit across from a bureaucrat?

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: public_servant


Fyi this thread will most likely spur a post on the renewal blog, probably not a "rant" but I will use it as a spring board to redrafting the top 10 reasons to work for Google into the top 10 reasons that I would like to see associated for working for the government.

-----Original Message-----
From: public_servant
To: ncharney


That's cool.

I mean, it's absolutely mind boggling how private companies, who are VERY concerned with profit and therefore productivity have recognized that allowing people certain "perks" actually improves their productivity.

Meanwhile the GOC can't even handle giving us access to facebook because they think we'll start slacking off.

If google can allow their employees to swim, work out, get massages, play with their pets ALL on company time and still continue to be exceptionally successful, why is the GOC stuck on their old-school thinking?

It's frustrating.

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: public_servant


In return for their good karma Google receives a certain level of commitment from their employees.

In fact I wonder if they have EVER had a problem with someone complaining about over time. Probably not.

GoC is just lucky that Google doesn't have a big office in Otown or it would be shit out of luck.

-----Original Message-----
From: public_servant
To: ncharney


Very lucky indeed, and I'm sure people don't complain about over time.


-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: mmangulabnan


Check this convo between me and public_servant re: work culture.

I want to use this to spring board into some sort discussion around Google's marketing of jobs, especially by trying create something GOC specific akin to their top 10 reasons to work for Google.

Not sure if it will be a spoof or a "future of ps thing" ... the former would be more entertaining, but it will (and should more aptly) end up as the latter.

-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan
To: ncharney


... looking forward to your treatment.

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: mmangulabnan


Here - what the PS should aspire to:

Top 10 Reasons to Work at Google in the Public Service

1. Lend a helping hand. With millions of visitors interactions every month, Google the Government of Canada has become an essential part of everyday life - like a good friend - connecting people with the information and services they need to live great lives.

2. Life is beautiful. Being a part of something that matters and working on products delivering services in which you can believe is remarkably fulfilling.

3. Appreciation is the best motivation, so we’ve created a fun and inspiring workspace you’ll be glad to be a part of, including on-site doctor and dentist; massage and yoga; professional development opportunities; on-site day care; shoreline running trails; and plenty of snacks to get you through the day.

4. Work and play are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to code write policy, enforce regulation and provide services to Canadians and pass the puck at the same time.

5. We love our employees, and we want them to know it. Google the Public Service offers a variety of benefits, including a choice of medical programs, company-matched 401(k), stock options RRSP and RESP contributions, maternity and paternity leave, and much more.

6. Innovation is our bloodline. Even the best technology service delivery model can be improved. We see endless opportunity to create even more relevant, more useful, and faster products services for our users Canadians. Google is the technology leader in organizing the world’s information. The Government of Canada is leading public sector innovation.

7. Good company everywhere you look. Googlers Public Servants range from former neurosurgeons, CEOs, and U.S. puzzle curling champions to alligator beaver wrestlers and former Marines members of the Canadian Forces and even former Googlers! No matter what their backgrounds Googlers Public Servants make for interesting cube mates.

8. Uniting the world Country, one user Canadian at a time. People in every country province and territory and every language use our products services. As such we think, act, and work globally nationally- just our little contribution to making the world Canada a better place.

9. Boldly go where no one has gone before. There are hundreds of challenges yet to solve. Your creative ideas matter here and are worth exploring. You’ll have the opportunity to develop innovative new products and services that millions of people will find useful.

10. There is such a thing as a free lunch after all. In fact we have them every day: healthy, yummy, and made with love.

-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan
To: ncharney


I think it's funny that you have no modifications for 3, and 10.

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney
To: mmangulabnan


Yeah but appreciation is the best motivation, couple that with a free lunch and renewal would be ‘un fait accompli’.



Wednesday, 10 September 2008

CPSRenewal.ca Email Rant: The Changing Nature of Work

Here is another email exchange between Mike and I that we decided to share with you.

-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan
To: ncharney
Subject: the changing nature of work

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=6e280be9-ab96-410f-bd0d-8f4289923a7f

-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney

To: mmangulabnan

Subject: RE: the changing nature of work


Good article - not mind blowing but a good synopsis of how work is changing. Employers should already be implementing strategies to mitigate the retention implications of these changes. Too bad the city of Hamilton fails to see things the same way ... score another victory against work life balance?

http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/432707

My favorite line:

“The whole energy thing is a red herring,” argued Councillor Lloyd Ferguson. “Oil has come down $25 since the news release (from Merulla) went out, and it sends a real bad message for the image of our city.

“The rest of the world has to work five days a week and we only four?”

I guess he fails to see that in fact promoting work life balance in the civil service could start a trend in the city that will ultimately attract people to it and its civil service...


-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan

To: ncharney

Subject: the changing nature of work


What a knob... and the rest of the world does not in fact work 5 days a week.


-----Original Message-----
From: ncharney

To: mmangulabnan

Subject: RE: the changing nature of work



His attitude is clearly of the pointy-haired boss variety:



Not to mention that working from home allows you to avoid certain distractions ...



Given context above, telecommuting also raises some ethical questions:



-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan

To: ncharney

Subject: the changing nature of work

Well played...

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

CPSRenewal.ca Email Rant: 'Distributed Work'

Not sure if this will become a regular feature of the blog or not but sometimes you just need to share things. Rather then simply post a round-up or a full blown column here is an interesting email exchange that Mike and I had today (Note I inverted the order of the email string so you chronologically it reads it top to bottom):

-----Original Message-----
From:ncharney
To: mmangulabnan
Subject: Why not do this with gov offices?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080812.wprsuite12/BNStory/Technology/home

FYI more info on 'distributed work'

http://www.thefutureofwork.net/assets/Understanding_Distributed_Work.pdf

-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan
To: ncharney
Subject: RE: Why not do this with gov offices?

because that would be smart...

baha: "[The US] recognize the many benefits and advantages and strongly support it," Mr. Fortier says. "Here, we don't use the carrot and we don't use the stick. There's not even a donkey."

There's tons of commercial space (and vacant commercial space) 2 blocks from my house. I'm not even gonna add up how much I could save in doing away with my bus pass, not having to buy extra groceries for lunches, not to mention buying lunches. (That's over $800 a year for the bus pass alone, for those counting - anyone paying more than that for parking/gas?). There's even a small fitness benefit attached in that I would be much more inclined to walk or bike to and from work every day. I might even be more inclined to work later because it wouldn't take me 40 minutes to get home. Set up an IM and I don't need to be here 85-90% of the time.

It's funny how we can work almost seamlessly with people in the regions (remember, even Guelph, Montreal, and Toronto are considered 'regions') but it's somehow impossible to work as effectively with someone who's 20 minutes down the road. The mentality seems to be, if you can be in the office, you should be in the office.

If someone can telecommute from Nunavut, surely I can telecommute from Hunt Club...

It seems the only people who are able/allowed to telecommute in the same area are people who have retired and returned to the workforce. I know, and have worked with people who have retired and returned who live in the area and telecommute the majority of their time. The opposite mentality seems to exist for these employees: if you don't need to be in the office, then you don't have to be in the office.

oh to dream.

-----Original Message-----
From:ncharney
To: mmangulabnan
Subject: Why not do this with gov offices?

can i post your mini rant /this email exchange on the blog with links to the article and the background paper I am reading now, after I finish reading it? if you want to make any edits do so in red below, but i think it is gold as is.

-----Original Message-----
From: mmangulabnan
To: ncharney
Subject: RE: Why not do this with gov offices?

[done] - I'm tempted to add something additional about the clothes I have to buy in order to 'look presentable' for my no-clients, but I won't


-----End-----

I don't think Mike wanted me to include that last one but, oh well. Happy Tuesday everyone.